|
Do you realize how much YOU have in common with Joe Paterno, Graham Spanier, Tim Curley and Mike McQuery? No, these men did not commit the physical crimes against children, as did Jerry Sandusky. However, they are responsible and liable for their own actions when there is even a hint that someone is abusing a child. This blog isn’t specifically about the Penn State case and who was (or wasn’t) fired, that will all pan out in court, but it is a REALITY check for all involved with youth that no one is invincible.
While the Penn State case is making national headlines because of its legendary coach and it’s football program, understand that this happens FREQUENTLY in youth sports. Most of our readers are involved in teams/leagues/youth programs in one-way or the other. Are you a coach, athletic director, team mom or a parent on the side-lines? Whatever your position, today is the day to step back and realize where exactly you fit into the lives of the kids participating in your youth sports organization. You are there to protect them at all cost.
Some time ago, we did a blog on Protect Your Kids From Predators In Youth Sports. This blog is a must read for anyone that has or is involved with children. It includes an article from Sports Illustrated from actual predators in youth programs saying “This is how we got away with it …this is how you protect your kids.” (Example from the article, Did you know, Studies have found that the average preferential molester victimizes about 120 children before he is caught? DISTURBING). It also contains useful Risk Management guidelines that can be implemented TODAY!

For more articles on preventing sexual abuse and molestation, visit our blog.
Shart this with others so that we all can make a difference.
Should a high school shot-putter that was injured by a shot thrown by his opponent be compensated because of his injury? According to Injured Shot Putter Chances In Court Are Shot, the plaintiff had participated in numerous track meets and had thrown the same shot hundreds of times. I fully agree with the courts in this case. The participant assumed the risk by participating in the event and had experience and knowledge of the game to know he could get injured. There is no difference in this incident and that of a football player running off of the sidelines and hitting the players or cheerleaders on the side. The sideliners know that if they are standing there, someone may hit them.
|