Collapse of Temporary Structure Exclusion In Sports

Category : General Liability, Recreation Departments, Teams / Leagues

General Liability insurance policies for sports and recreation organizations sometimes contain a potentially dangerous exclusion entitled “Collapse of Temporary Structure Exclusion.”

 

Presumably, the purpose of this exclusion is to protect the General Liability carrier against paying a claim in the event of collapse of bleachers or similar structures such as tents, signs, billboards, and fences that are temporary in nature.

 

Unfortunately, the exclusion does not define “temporary”.  Does “temporary” mean a one time event?  A season?  A Year?  Are any bleachers that can be moved considered temporary?

 

Bleacher collapse is a serious event in terms of both the number of spectators that can be injured and their severity potential.  Because of the seriousness of these bleacher collapse incidents, sports organizations can’t afford to have this ambiguous exclusion on their General Liability policy.

 

Source:  John Sadler


Digg!

Contractual Liability Limitation In Sports General Liability Policies

Category : General Liability

Standard General Liability policy forms automatically include coverage for many types of contractual liability that may be assumed for tort liability for injuries to third parties in certain types of hold harmless and indemnification provisions. The Contractual Liability Limitation endorsement can take away needed protection for a sports organization that enters into certain contracts

 

For example, a league may send a team to play in a travel tournament and the agreement with the tournament host may include an indemnification and/or hold harmless provision that requires the travel team and its administrators to contractually assume all liability for injuries to players during tournament events, even if due to the sole negligence of the tournament host. In the event of a player injury during tournament host provided entertainment such as a swimming party, the travel team would be contractually responsible for all damages even though liability for such would normally belong to the tournament host but for the hold harmless / indemnification provision. The presence of the Contractual Liability Limitation in this example would likely remove all General Liability coverage for the travel team and may subject its administrators and coaches to personal liability.

 

The presence of the Contractual Liability Limitation endorsement should be negotiated out of a General Liability policy for a sports organization. If negotiations are not successful, a new carrier should be found upon renewal.

 

Source: John Sadler

Punitive Damages Exclusion In General Liability Insurance

Category : General Liability

The punitive damages exclusion on a General Liability policy can have a devastating effect for sports and recreation organizations such as teams, leagues, recreation departments, camps, etc. and their directors, officers, employees, and volunteers. General Liability policy forms containing this exclusion should be avoided since coverage for punitive damages is generally available in the market place.

 

Most of the lawsuits that arise in the sports and recreation context for participant and spectator injury ask for punitive damages in addition to regular compensatory damages. This is why the lawsuit papers use high voltage words to describe the wrongful conduct such as wanton, willful, grossly negligent, acting with reckless disregard for the safety of others, etc. Punitive dames are meant to punish the wrongdoer by making an example for others to see.

 

Since most lawsuits ask for punitive damages, it makes sense that coverage for such is desirable in order to reduce the worry factor.

 

Punitive damages may not be insurable in some states as such coverage may considered to be a violation of public policy. Various state statutory codes that limit coverage for punitive damages often distinguish between directly assessed punitive damages and vicariously assessed punitive damages. Directly assessed punitive damages are those that are awarded directly against the wrongdoer. On the other hand, vicariously assessed punitive damages are those that are assessed against a defendant that was not directly negligent but instead had liability imputed under agency principal law. For example, a corporation may be vicariously liable for the acts of its employees.

 

The following states have laws that limit the insurability of punitive damages that are directly assessed against the defendant: AR, CA, CO, CT, FL, IL, IN, KY, LA, ME, MA, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NY, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, TN, UT, and VA.

 

The following states have laws that limit the insurability of punitive damages that are vicariously assessed against the defendant: NY, OH, UT, and VA.

 

A number of states are currently undecided on the issue of insurability of punitive damages.

 

Source: John Sadler

Beware Athletic Participant Exclusion In Sports General Liability

Category : General Liability, Recreation Departments

The existence of “Exclusion – Athletic Or Sports Participants” is by far the most troubling exclusion that is commonly found in General Liability policies of sports and recreation organizations. The applicable language of this exclusion reads: “With respect to any operations shown in the schedule, this insurance does not apply to “bodily injury” to any person while practicing for or participating in any sports or athletic contest or exhibition that you sponsor.”

 

Obviously, sports and recreation organizations frequently face these types of lawsuit risks and the damages tend to be severe in nature. Therefore, it is unconscionable for this type of exclusion to appear in the General Liability policy of a sports organization if such coverage is readily available in the market place. And, such coverage is readily available and affordable in the current market place with the exception of certain semi pro adult sports or sports of a high risk nature.

 

Sports and recreation organizations that have the Athletic Participant Exclusion have their coverage reduced to nothing more than a policy that covers lawsuits arising out of spectator injuries.

 

If the General Liability policy is “silent” and there is no mention of the Athletic Participant Exclusion, it can be safely assumed that coverage automatically exists even if it is not affirmatively stated. However, some carriers provide an affirmative coverage grant by creating a coverage called Participant Legal Liability (even though this is not necessary and is primarily a marketing ploy). It is important to note that most carriers that specialize in writing General Liability for sports and recreation organizations do provide the affirmative coverage grant of Participant Legal Liability on a special endorsement. But, the special endorsement may actually introduce certain new exclusions such as Player vs Player or Participant vs Participant which would not be found if the policy were silent. These two exclusions will be discussed in a future blog.

 

It is always surprising to me to find out how many sports and recreation organizations have the Athletic Participant Exclusion on their policy but don’t seem to be aware even though they have presumably knowledgeable insurance agents and risk managers looking out after their interests. I teach classes to recreation department administrators and I have found that the Athletic Participant Exclusion exists on roughly 25% of the General Liability policies that they bring to class to be reviewed.

 

Source: John Sadler

Financial Strength Of Sports General Liability Policy

Category : Financial Strength

The financial strength of a General Liability carrier for a sports organization is even more critical than for its Accident carrier.  The reason is because General Liability limits are normally higher and the payments made can occur many years after the injury.
 
The standard in the insurance industry for measuring financial strength is A.M. Best Company.  Most risk managers advise that the minimum acceptable rating is A- with a financial category size of VII out of XV.  To put this in context, the largest and strongest carriers have A.M. Best ratings of A+ XV.
 
A strong rating by A.M. Best is not a perfect predictor of financial strength, but it is the best gauge that we have available without pouring over data from multiple rating agencies.
 
 Source:  John Sadler
 
Copyright 2004-2009, Sadler and Company, IncAll Rights Reserved

Covered Activities Under Sports General Liability Policies

Category : General Liability, Recreation Departments, Sports Camps / Clinics, Teams / Leagues

General Liability policies for sports and recreation organizations should cover the following activities that are adult supervised and sanctioned by the sports organization:
  • Tryouts
  • Games
  • Practices
  • Tournament
  • Non Sport Outing
It is critical that coverage is included for non sport outings such as swimming parties, backyard cookouts, restaurant and ice cream celebration trips, etc.  Some of the most serious injuries and largest lawsuits that I have witnessed over the past 20 years have come from non sport outings – particularly swimming parties.
 
Some General Liability policies that are deficient may restrict coverage to owned and leased premises that are scheduled on the policy.  This could be a big problem if the sports organization has travel teams or if non sporting outings occur away from the premises.
 
Some General Liability policies include endorsements that restrict coverage to the time periods when officially sanctioned events take place.  This is a big problem if a sports organization owns its field or facility or is responsible under the terms of a lease on a 24/7 basis.
 
Source:  John Sadler
 
Copyright 2004-2009, Sadler and Company, IncAll Rights Reserved